Skip to main content

Dvorak: Symphony #8

In the eyes of the average casual classical music listener, Dvorak's Eighth Symphony is generally overshadowed by his much more widely known Ninth Symphony.

But in the eyes of true Dvorak lovers, however, the Eighth is more popular by far. Real Dvorak fans cherish the raucous and exuberant folk music of Dvorak's native Bohemia--and that's exactly what suffuses this symphony. It makes listening to this symphony an experience of pure joy. And at an all-too-brief 35 minutes or so in length, this thrilling symphony is over before it begins.
**********************
Wolfgang Sawallisch and the Philadelphia Orchestra
Antonin Dvorak (1841-1904)
Symphonies 7 and 8
EMI, 1990
**********************
Dvorak's Eighth Symphony is proof that not all great symphonies are conceived in suffering. Occasionally a symphony--like this one, or Brahms' Second--bursts out of a composer during a period of contentment and happiness. And Dvorak composed this entire work in just two and a half months.

Of course it only takes a cursory survey of the landscape of classical music composers to see that this "happiness exception" is just that--an exception.

Listener notes for Dvorak's Eighth Sympony:
1) I'm sorry to complain about bad intonation right off the bat, but is there something about the Philadelphia Orchestra and their principal clarinetist? Listen to the first movement of this CD at the 8:05 mark. Why is this guy so often out of tune?

2) In the second movement, you can hear conductor Wolfgang Sawallisch let out a big grunt after the violin duet and right before the full orchestra enters. It's at about the 4:00 mark. Feel it, Wolfie!

3) How great are the flourishes and ornamentations of the Slavic folk themes throughout the third movement? Grace notes and glissandos abound. What a blast it is to listen to this movement.

4) Also, listen very closely at the 0:52 mark of the third movement for a beautiful, hard to play, and almost throwaway run by the violas (it comes right after the violins finish their own beautiful folk melody; also you'll hear it again at the 4:12 mark). This is sort of emblematic of the "ornaments" in Dvorak's symphonies. If you weren't listening closely, you'd miss the part; but once you know it's there, it's thrilling to hear such a difficult subordinate musical line rise up and then disappear in an instant.

5) The trumpet parts, for lack of a better word, suck in this symphony. They aren't quite as bad as Mozart's oom-pah parts, but they're close (Dvorak has a thing for giving the trumpets "bup bup bup bahhh" parts). It's not until the start of the fourth movement that the principal trumpet gets to shake himself out of rest-counting somnolence and play a real (if brief) part.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty

Shostakovich: First Symphony

I can't help it. I just don't like Shostakovich. This is the second time I've tried my hand at a Shosty symphony, after listening to and heartily disliking his Eleventh Symphony . Unfortunately, I felt no emotional connection to his First Symphony either. The music seems random and arbitrary to me--and to be honest, I even caught myself rolling my eyes at a few of Shosty's musical devices. And as I'll show in the listener notes, it's more film score music than symphony. ********************** Leonard Bernstein and the Chicago Symphony Dmitri Shostakovich (1906-1975) Shostakovich: Symphonies Nos. 1 & 7 Deutsche Grammophone, 1989 ********************** Lucky me: I've still got three more of his symphonies left to listen to: his Second, Seventh and Twelfth. A little historical background before we get to the listener notes: Shostakovich wrote his First Symphony in 1925 at the shockingly young age of 18. It was his graduation piece at the Leningrad Conserva