Skip to main content

How to "Learn" a Piece of Classical Music

Classical music isn't meant to be listened to once and then forgotten. It is complex and many-layered music that is meant to be learned.

But what does it even mean to "learn" a work of classical music?

If you were in a music appreciation class, you might be subjected to a "needle drop" test, where the teacher plays a brief section of a symphony for the class. If you can name the symphony and the composer (and likely some other trivia like the year it was written or the year the composer was born or died), congratulations! You've "learned" that piece.

A professional musician would say he "learned" a classical music work once he can play--and play well, hopefully--all of the relevant parts in that symphony assigned to his instrument.

But for those of us who are not in class or working as pro musicians, those of us with busy lives and a limited amount of time to dedicate to classical music, I'll submit a more entry-level definition of what it means to "learn" a classical music work: can you recognize it?

For a person with an average ear and an average memory for music, it should take four or five attentive, careful listens to a symphony to satisfy this definition of classical music familiarity.

If that seems like a lot of work, just know that there's a reward waiting for you at the end of this journey: After those four or five listens, you'll really start to know the key themes, motifs and melodies of the work. You'll know how each movement starts and ends, and you'll build your own mental list of your personal favorite parts of each movement. You'll truly understand the "arc" of the symphony.

Many classical music works are simply too complex for the listener to ingest and fully understand right away, and thus most symphonies sound better and better upon repeated listens. To use an analogy, think of them as films like Citizen Kane where many of the most interesting cinematic techniques and other subtleties don't become apparent until you've seen the film a few times.

Other symphonies, perhaps Mozart's or Haydn's, might have witticisms and "in jokes" that you may only discover after repeated listens. And to stretch the film analogy still further (and give you an unexpected window into my amazing cultural sophistication), these works are akin to films like Talladega Nights, where you catch some of the best lines and jokes only after a few viewings. And hey, comedies are always funnier once you've memorized a few of the best quotes.

In fact, I'd argue that the real pleasures of listening to any classical music work begin to manifest after the second or third close listen. It's ironic, but it's more fun to listen to a symphony once you know what's coming.

Try this with the next symphony you choose to listen to. If you're not sure where to begin, I've compiled a list of key works that you can use to start your own classical music collection. Pick a out a few these CDs and let me know how it goes!

Comments

Josh said…
Thank you for the information that you have, I really like it. Classic music is truly one of my favorite music to play.

Learning to play music instrument in a classic manner is really difficult. Thanks to music instructional dvd and to music books as well.

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co...

Schumann: Second Symphony

I stood by the body of my passionately loved husband, and was calm. All my feelings were absorbed in thankfulness to God that he was at last set free, and as I kneeled by his bed I was filled with awe. It was as if his holy spirit was hovering over me--Ah! If only he had taken me with him. --Clara Schumann, after the death of her husband Robert Schumann We return to George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra's exceptional recording of Schumann's Four Symphonies to hear his Symphony #2. ********************** George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra Robert Schumann (1810-1856) Schumann: Symphonies 1-4; Manfred Overture CBS, 1958/Sony, 1996 ********************** When I sat down to listen to Schumann's Second Symphony, I assumed it would sound as Mozart-like as his First Symphony. I couldn't have been more wrong: these two symphonies sound strikingly different. Listener Notes for Schumann's Symphony #2: 1) You can tell right away that this symphony is far more Roman...

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty ...