Skip to main content

Mozart: Symphony #29 and Symphony #34

I'll tell you a little secret.

I resent Mozart.

No, I'm not some sort of modern-day Salieri. It's because I used to play the trumpet.

**********************
James Levine and the Weiner Philharmoniker
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791)
Symphony #29
Symphony #34

Deutsche Grammophon, 1986
**********************

No trumpet player likes Mozart and Mozart didn't like trumpet players. And the parts that trumpet players have to play in Mozart symphonies heartily show this dislike.

Supposedly Mozart's baggage with the trumpet had more to do with the fact that the instruments of that day were valveless and didn't allow for the pitch control or the technical capabilities that his music typically required from other instruments.

So he wrote his music they way he did, thank goodness for that. But he always gave the trumpets what we used to condescendingly call "oom-pah parts" (think John Sousa marches and what the french horns have to suffer through in those).

And what is always the worst for a musician (especially a high school- or college-age male musician who was more interested in checking out the pretty girls in the woodwind section in front of us) playing oom-pah parts in a Mozart symphony means having to count rests. In other words, not only do you hate the part you have to play, you have to pay close attention the whole time, counting bars, so you come in at the right time. Otherwise you get into trouble and the conductor starts it all over again. Thus causing you to have to play the hated part again.

I spent years avoiding Mozart during and after I was performing as a musician because I thought all his trumpet parts sucked. Talk about not thinking (or listening) outside the box.

But it was several years ago that I bought a couple of Mozart symphonies and I guess enough years had gone by since I was last playing the trumpet that I could really listen to the works as a whole. I fell in love with them.

So why then do I resent Mozart? Because after all of those years of rest-counting and oom-pah part playing, I thought I hated Mozart. And I missed out on several years of utter classical music joy.

I gotta blame somebody.

I'll have much more to say and to celebrate of Mozart's (all too brief) life and the genius of his works in the coming months.




Comments

Anonymous said…
ha ha - funny!

gotta hate those Sousa marches, but Mozart wrote some great horn concertos.

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty

Schubert: Symphony #3

I have a confession to make. Today's CD is not only further proof of my need to start this blog, but it is perhaps the most embarrassing example of how mindless and uncontemplative my life had become over the past several years. This CD sat on my shelf with more than a hundred other CDs for years, unlistened to, unnoticed, and collecting dust. It was just like all the rest of my CDs, except, uh, in one key respect: It was still in its cellophane wrapper. I had been so out of touch with myself that I bought CDs that I forgot I bought. I must have wanted to listen to this CD at some point, but apparently in the time between buying the CD and putting it on the shelf, I got distracted. For ten years. That is a prime, and admittedly foolish-sounding, example of why I'm taking a break from my career, and why I started this blog. I guess I didn't want to wake up in another ten years and hear myself making excuses for myself like "I work too hard and make too much money to