Skip to main content

Bach: The Brandenburg Concertos

I considered holding off on Bach for a little bit because I feel he's almost too difficult to listen to, especially for classical music beginners.

But because Bach holds such an important place in music history, and because his music will be the cornerstone of any basic classical music collection, we're going to tackle one of his more accessible works early on in this blog.

**********************
Herbert von Karajan and the Berlin Philharmonic

Johann Sebastian Bach
The Brandengurg Concertos
Orchestral Suites No. 2 &3
Deutsche Grammophon, 1965
**********************

The Brandenberg Concertos (there are six of them) are deeply complicated works, but don't let that scare you off. These works are accessible to a novice listener. And I'd suggest if you are starting your own classical music collection, get a copy of the Brandenberg Concertos early on. The particular recording I have (listed above) is performed in a relatively slow tempo on modern instruments, and I prefer it that way. But you should also consider getting one or two other recordings of these concertos in order to hear how other performers and conductors treat the music.

And pay particular attention to Brandenberg Concerto #5 and the stunning harpsichord solos that it features.

What I've always loved about Bach was that he labored so hard in a state of total obscurity. Nobody really cared about his music while he lived, and his music remained forgotten and obscure for a century after he died. Yet clearly the guy systematically worked his ass off his entire life, as he created an enormous body of work that towers over classical music. He was a deeply religious man, so perhaps he felt God was watching him, so it mattered not that his fellow man was indifferent to his work.

I think the two best words to describe Bach's music are "cerebral" and "complex." Bach's music is so complex it can be hard to appreciate for classical music beginners. Have you ever attempted to, say, hum a few bars from one of Bach's compositions?

You see what I mean. And yet, they were playing Brandenberg Concerto #5 in the Port Authority Bus Terminal the other day. It almost made it a tolerable experience for me to stand in line for a commuter bus.

We'll get into more Bach compositions as we work through my 100+ CDs, including his Cello Suites, some of his violin concertos and portions of The Well Tempered Clavier. And hopefully we'll also cover some of the interpretive debates on Bach's work (slow or fast? original instruments or modern instruments? etc, etc).




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty

Schubert: Symphony #3

I have a confession to make. Today's CD is not only further proof of my need to start this blog, but it is perhaps the most embarrassing example of how mindless and uncontemplative my life had become over the past several years. This CD sat on my shelf with more than a hundred other CDs for years, unlistened to, unnoticed, and collecting dust. It was just like all the rest of my CDs, except, uh, in one key respect: It was still in its cellophane wrapper. I had been so out of touch with myself that I bought CDs that I forgot I bought. I must have wanted to listen to this CD at some point, but apparently in the time between buying the CD and putting it on the shelf, I got distracted. For ten years. That is a prime, and admittedly foolish-sounding, example of why I'm taking a break from my career, and why I started this blog. I guess I didn't want to wake up in another ten years and hear myself making excuses for myself like "I work too hard and make too much money to