Skip to main content

Edward Elgar: Symphony #2

Anyone who made it to their high school graduation will instantly recognize Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March #1, which features possibly one of the most memorable classical music melodies of the 20th century.

But I wouldn't bother making today's recording, Elgar's Symphony #2, a building block of your classical music collection.

**********************
Sir Adrian Boult and the London Philharmonic Orchestra
Edward Elgar (1857-1934)
Symphony #2 (1911)
EMI Classics, 1991 (0riginal recording 1976)
**********************
The symphony seemed both shapeless and plotless to me, even after two close listens. That would be fine if the music were in any way arresting or beautiful (see Debussy or Vaughan Williams, both of whom composed shapeless, plotless beautiful music), but I found I had zero emotional involvement in this symphony throughout.

In fact, if anybody would like my copy of this CD, just shoot me a quick email with your snail-mail address (see my profile for my email) and I'll be happy to mail it to you. First caller wins.

One quick listener note: I'm not one to pick apart mistakes in a recording, but I can't help noticing them. If you listen very carefully at the 7:50 mark in track #3 (the second movement) of this recording you'll hear the oboe player badly miss a couple of notes. Ouch.

Labels:

Comments

Chip Michael said…
As a trombone player, I performed this piece (in one form or another) for 6 years - after having heard it at least a half dozen times before that. When it came time to graduate I cringed when the music began - which is unfortunately, because it really is a lovely piece.

Many years later I heard yet another version of it, but this time in a concert (when I didn't realise I was going to hear Pomp and Circumstance - but thought I was hearing something from Elgar - opps, same thing!). Anyway, the music was lovely and really changed my impression of it.

However, that said, would I purchase a recording of it - even a flawless one? No, not likely. Sorry, Mr Elgar, no disrespect. It's just a bit overdone in the US.
April 21, 2008 at 6:49 AM
Daniel said…
Chip:
I hear you... in fact if I recall correctly the trombone parts in Pomp and Circumstance pretty much suck. Just like the trumpet parts... :)

But the brass parts in Symphony #2 sound like they'd be even LESS fun to play--maybe with the exception of the ripping high B trumpet note in the final movement.

Thanks for reading!

DK
April 21, 2008 at 7:24 AM
Anonymous said…
Yeah, the trombone part for Pomp sucks. I mean, between the repetivity and the boring rhythm, it kills imagination.
June 8, 2011 at 2:35 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Start Your Own Classical Music Collection

I'm often asked by people who are new to classical music for a list of CDs or key symphonies that I think are the best choices to start off a new classical music collection. What are ideal symphonies or works that can help you get started getting to know classical music? Today I'm going to attempt to answer this question, and I'll provide you with a brief list of works that can form the foundation of a great collection of important classical music. Keep in mind that whenever one reviews any type of list like this, invariably one can complain that a given work was left off the list ("where's Chopin? or Mahler?"), or even that some work was left on the list ("ugh, Beethoven's 5th again?"). This list is in no way meant to be exhaustive. It is merely a starting point for the novice listener. If you purchase recordings of these works and listen to each and every one of them, you'll have a great head start on your journey towards getting to know c...
10 comments
Read more

About This Blog

This blog is the result of a New Year's resolution. I have a good-sized collection of classical music at home that has been collecting dust for years, and I wanted to make 2008 the year that I actually made an effort to listen to it. All of it. I have a reasonably thorough musical education, having played trumpet throughout elementary, middle and high school. I was also principal trumpet in my university wind ensemble for two years before I gave up playing. I also have some basic grounding in music theory and composition, although it's gone quite stale through years of disuse. However, there is much that I don't know about classical music, and one of the purposes of this blog is to force me, in a public forum no less, to learn and share thoughts about the discs in my collection as I listen to them. I'll also link to music selections on Amazon.com that are applicable to the composer or composition I'm featuring. Occasionally I'll write posts that hopefully will ...
2 comments
Read more

How to "Learn" a Piece of Classical Music

Classical music isn't meant to be listened to once and then forgotten. It is complex and many-layered music that is meant to be learned. But what does it even mean to "learn" a work of classical music? If you were in a music appreciation class, you might be subjected to a "needle drop" test, where the teacher plays a brief section of a symphony for the class. If you can name the symphony and the composer (and likely some other trivia like the year it was written or the year the composer was born or died), congratulations! You've "learned" that piece. A professional musician would say he "learned" a classical music work once he can play--and play well, hopefully--all of the relevant parts in that symphony assigned to his instrument. But for those of us who are not in class or working as pro musicians, those of us with busy lives and a limited amount of time to dedicate to classical music, I'll submit a more entry-level definition of w...
1 comment
Read more