Skip to main content

Brahms: Symphony #4

I just finished listening to a symphony that has, at a stroke, made this entire blog worth every minute I've spent writing it.

This CD of Brahms 4th Symphony has been sitting on the top shelf of my CD rack, collecting dust, for at least two years. I've never once listened to it until now. And I cannot believe I've let this amazing work lie fallow in my home without even knowing it.

And now I have a new all-time favorite Brahms symphony.
**********************
Carlos Kleiber and the Weiner Philharmoniker
Johannes Brahms (1833-1897)
Symphony #4
Deutsche Grammophon, 1981
**********************
This symphony is so haunting and beautiful that I had to listen to it a second time immediately after the first.

I find the contrast between Brahms' first two symphonies and his fourth particularly interesting. His first two symphonies seem structured and formal, in the style of Beethoven's symphonies (note that this is not an original thought--most serious classical music commentators would agree with this assertion).

Brahms' Fourth Symphony, however, is music of an entirely different style and era. I'll submit to you one brief example: you could easily convince me that the second movement of Brahms' Fourth Symphony was written by Mahler--a composer who to some extent was a contemporary of Brahms, but who wrote much more florid and lyrical music.

Two brief listener notes:

1) Listen to the eight chords played at the very beginning of the fourth movement, and then listen to how the rest of the movement is built around wildly different variations on that theme. This musical form is called a passacaglia.

2) Notice the decidedly un-Beethovenian style ending, yet another clear example of how Brahms made a stylistic break from his symphonic idol. The Fourth symphony resolves itself quickly--it just ends, almost unceremoniously. There's no 25-second series of repeated fifths and octaves like the melodramatic ending of Brahms' First Symphony, or for that matter any of Beethoven's symphonies.

I can't wait to listen to Brahms' Third.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Start Your Own Classical Music Collection

I'm often asked by people who are new to classical music for a list of CDs or key symphonies that I think are the best choices to start off a new classical music collection. What are ideal symphonies or works that can help you get started getting to know classical music? Today I'm going to attempt to answer this question, and I'll provide you with a brief list of works that can form the foundation of a great collection of important classical music. Keep in mind that whenever one reviews any type of list like this, invariably one can complain that a given work was left off the list ("where's Chopin? or Mahler?"), or even that some work was left on the list ("ugh, Beethoven's 5th again?"). This list is in no way meant to be exhaustive. It is merely a starting point for the novice listener. If you purchase recordings of these works and listen to each and every one of them, you'll have a great head start on your journey towards getting to know c...

About This Blog

This blog is the result of a New Year's resolution. I have a good-sized collection of classical music at home that has been collecting dust for years, and I wanted to make 2008 the year that I actually made an effort to listen to it. All of it. I have a reasonably thorough musical education, having played trumpet throughout elementary, middle and high school. I was also principal trumpet in my university wind ensemble for two years before I gave up playing. I also have some basic grounding in music theory and composition, although it's gone quite stale through years of disuse. However, there is much that I don't know about classical music, and one of the purposes of this blog is to force me, in a public forum no less, to learn and share thoughts about the discs in my collection as I listen to them. I'll also link to music selections on Amazon.com that are applicable to the composer or composition I'm featuring. Occasionally I'll write posts that hopefully will ...

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co...