Skip to main content

Comparing Recordings of Symphonies

One of the more subtle pleasures of classical music comes after you've become familiar with a few different symphonies and you have the opportunity to compare different recordings of the same piece.

There's no better way to get to know a great classical music work. In fact, after you've bought five or ten different MP3s or CDs to start your classical music collection, I strongly encourage you to choose your favorite two or three symphonies from your first crop of discs and get yourself an additional copy of each one of them.

A few thoughts on the process of comparing recordings: once you get your new recording, before listening to it, I suggest having one more close listen to your old one. Then, after listening through both, think about which aspects of your new recording are different, superior, inferior, etc., to your original one, and why? On the whole, which recording do you prefer, and why?

There are no right or wrong answers here. The point of the exercise is to enjoy the process of listening, and to gain even more familiarity and intimacy with a favorite work of classical music. When you hear different orchestras perform the same piece of music, you can get to know even extremely complicated classical music works on a much deeper level.

This process becomes even more fun if you have a favorite passage or two from a favorite symphony. I'll shortly be writing about my alternate version of Brahms' First Symphony, and I will do this exact exercise with my personal favorite passage from that work (it's in the fourth movement, where the trombones softly--and in my original recording, discordantly--play the key theme). This passage, which to me is the emotional climax of the entire symphony, turned out to be a big disappointment on my original CD, so I'm interested to see how my other recording handles that same portion of the work. Will they bungle it too, or will they nail it?

As you repeat this process with other favorite works, you'll start to notice subtleties about them that you never before perceived. This goes way beyond basic differences like how fast or how loud the orchestra plays. Rather, you might hear emphasis on certain instruments or sections of the orchestra on one recording that you don't hear on the other. You might even hear totally new parts--one conductor might really bring out a particular instrument at a certain point, while another conductor might ignore that same part. Conductors (and for that matter recording engineers) have wide discretion in how they produce a given performance.

Finally, think about how you respond on an emotional level to the two works. Does one version of a symphony really move you, while another simply doesn't? Why? A mediocre recording of truly great symphony can drive me to tears, and yet I will sometimes listen to a supposedly high quality recording of that same symphony and feel absolutely no emotional connection to the work whatsoever.

And of course, there's the occasional performance that is so bad that it drives me to eye-rolling and groaning (and not the good kind of groaning). Hopefully we won't cross paths with any such recording over the course of this blog, but if we do, I'll be sure at least to make an amusing and insulting blog post out of it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co...

Schumann: Second Symphony

I stood by the body of my passionately loved husband, and was calm. All my feelings were absorbed in thankfulness to God that he was at last set free, and as I kneeled by his bed I was filled with awe. It was as if his holy spirit was hovering over me--Ah! If only he had taken me with him. --Clara Schumann, after the death of her husband Robert Schumann We return to George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra's exceptional recording of Schumann's Four Symphonies to hear his Symphony #2. ********************** George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra Robert Schumann (1810-1856) Schumann: Symphonies 1-4; Manfred Overture CBS, 1958/Sony, 1996 ********************** When I sat down to listen to Schumann's Second Symphony, I assumed it would sound as Mozart-like as his First Symphony. I couldn't have been more wrong: these two symphonies sound strikingly different. Listener Notes for Schumann's Symphony #2: 1) You can tell right away that this symphony is far more Roman...

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty ...