Skip to main content

Brahms: Symphony #1

Brahms is often referred to as "the third B" (following Bach and Beethoven) of the giants of classical music. But what's so compelling to me about Brahms was his self-critical nature and the ridiculously high-standards he set for himself. He constantly denigrated his compositions, even destroying much of his own work that was in his opinion substandard.

If this guy thought his work was substandard, where does that leave the rest of us?

To me the lesson here is that a creator can be the worst judge of his own work, and you should never let self-criticism interfere with your creative output.

Now if I could just do that myself...

**********************
Leonard Bernstein and the Weiner Philharmoniker
Johannes Brahms
Symphony #1
Academic Festival Overture
Deutsche Grammophon, 1983
**********************
If you want to look for particularly gripping passages of Brahms' First Symphony, you can start by listening closely to the first few minutes of the second movement, which opens with a moving string passage and flows into a beautiful solo by the oboe.

This symphony is so beautiful and so powerful (when performed well) that I consider it a critical early building block of any classical musical collection. However, I have two quibbles with the specific recording that I have, so I do not recommend you buying the actual Deutsche Grammophon CD from my collection that I list above. Just get a different recording--you can start by taking a look at the link below in this post.

In any case, on to the quibbles, which I include here more for humor value than anything else:

One problem is a few pretty bad out-of-tune moments in the fourth movement. The worst is in the passage that begins at about the 4:27 mark in the fourth movement, when the trombones softly play the key theme, and somebody in the trombone section really lets out a couple of bad off-key notes there. This is for me the emotional climax of the symphony, and I just can't bear to hear this passage with that guy in there muffing it up for everybody else.

The other quibble I have is more surreal: at the 2:57 to 3:03 mark in the second movement you can actually hear Leonard Bernstein mumbling the melody to himself along with the orchestra. You'll need good headphones and a decent ear to hear this but it's definitely there. It's such a bizarre thing to hear in a professionally-recorded symphony that I could hardly believe my own ears. But then it happens again in the second movement, at the 9:36 to 9:38 mark and then again at one or two other places in the recording! Weird. Granted, it's a live recording and I guess he was really getting into it, so good for him.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty

Schubert: Symphony #3

I have a confession to make. Today's CD is not only further proof of my need to start this blog, but it is perhaps the most embarrassing example of how mindless and uncontemplative my life had become over the past several years. This CD sat on my shelf with more than a hundred other CDs for years, unlistened to, unnoticed, and collecting dust. It was just like all the rest of my CDs, except, uh, in one key respect: It was still in its cellophane wrapper. I had been so out of touch with myself that I bought CDs that I forgot I bought. I must have wanted to listen to this CD at some point, but apparently in the time between buying the CD and putting it on the shelf, I got distracted. For ten years. That is a prime, and admittedly foolish-sounding, example of why I'm taking a break from my career, and why I started this blog. I guess I didn't want to wake up in another ten years and hear myself making excuses for myself like "I work too hard and make too much money to