Skip to main content

Telemann: Concerto in D and Two Overtures

"For some listeners today, Telemann represents all that is boring in Baroque music: a constant patter of mindless musical patterns, churned out ad nauseum.... Classical music stations constantly program Telemann as a pleasantry, or palliative, before or after more demanding fare."*

Ouch. I don't think I'd go quite so far.

Telemann belongs to a group of (sometimes indistinguishable) Baroque-era composers such as Vivaldi, Rameau, Albinoni, Scarlatti and Corelli, Couperin and Purcell. And, certainly, classical music stations love to play this music because the pieces tend to be brief (it's hard to run ads on a radio station if you only play hour-long Mahler symphonies), pleasing to the ear, and yes, even palliative.

**********************
Trevor Pinnock and the English Concert
Georg Philipp Telemann (1681-1767)
Concerto in D Major
Overture-Suite in G Minor
Overture-Suite in D Major
Deutsche Grammophon, 1994
**********************
But you have to consider classical music in the context of its genre.

Sure, this music is bright and cheery. Yes, it's palliative. It certainly lacks the seriousness and gravitas of a Beethoven or Brahms symphony. But the music is also quite complex and worth several listens just to study out all the complex melodic lines that weave in and out of each composition.

Furthermore, would you ever play a Beethoven symphony for background music in your home? Uh, no. For one thing, you'll find yourself contantly running over to the stereo to turn the volume down or up--there are too many volume changes and climaxes in this kind of a symphonic work for it to serve as background music. In contrast, this Telemann disc plays at an almost constant volume.

Also, it's okay to give your ears a little bit of what I'd call "classical music candy" once in a while. You don't always have to be moved to tears when listening to a CD.


* from The Essential Canon of Classical Music" by David Dubal.

Note: I recommend this book highly, it's an excellent and easy to read reference guide for classical music.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co...

Schumann: Second Symphony

I stood by the body of my passionately loved husband, and was calm. All my feelings were absorbed in thankfulness to God that he was at last set free, and as I kneeled by his bed I was filled with awe. It was as if his holy spirit was hovering over me--Ah! If only he had taken me with him. --Clara Schumann, after the death of her husband Robert Schumann We return to George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra's exceptional recording of Schumann's Four Symphonies to hear his Symphony #2. ********************** George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra Robert Schumann (1810-1856) Schumann: Symphonies 1-4; Manfred Overture CBS, 1958/Sony, 1996 ********************** When I sat down to listen to Schumann's Second Symphony, I assumed it would sound as Mozart-like as his First Symphony. I couldn't have been more wrong: these two symphonies sound strikingly different. Listener Notes for Schumann's Symphony #2: 1) You can tell right away that this symphony is far more Roman...

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty ...