Skip to main content

Bach: Violin Concertos

This week I listened to one of our all-time favorite CDs, a recording of three of Bach's most famous violin concertos. It reminded me of my favorite Bach story:

It dates from college. My roomate in those days was a capable piano player, and at college he took organ lessons and became quite a gifted organ player.

Once during his senior year, he was practicing in the University's chapel, pounding away at Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D minor. A young freshman kid walked into the chapel, came up to him, and in a fit of wanting to show how cultured he was, he asked, "is this BWV 565?"

"Yes, it is. But dude, don't call it that. Nobody calls it that." I think he also muttered under his breath, "you dweeb" as the kid slunk away.

And therein lies a lesson (I guess). Don't bother to try to show off--it only makes you sound like a tool.
**********************
David and Igor Oistrach, violins
The Royal Philharmonic Orchestra
Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750)
Violin Concerto in A minor (BWV 1041)
Violin Concerto in E major (BWV 1042)
Violin Concerto in D minor "Double Concerto" (BWV 1043)
Deutsche Grammophon, 1962
**********************
Today's disc is a heavy rotation favorite in our home, and we've probably listened to it hundreds of times over the years. A couple of comments:

1) These are some of Bach's most well-known works and they are a privilege to listen to. I was unable to find an exact match of the disc in our collection, but I've found two excellent substitutions that you can consider, with links here and below (once again, if you purchase products at Amazon via links on my site, I will receive a small affiliate fee--think of it as my tip jar):

First is a Deutsche Grammophon disc of BWV 1041, 1042 and 1043 with violinist Hillary Hahn.

Second is a complete collection of Bach Concertos from Trevor Pinnock and The English Concert Orchestra on five CDs. This collection is well-regarded (take a look at the feedback comments), and is available for a surprisingly reasonable price.

2) Another brief comment on how pointless classical music snobbery is: on my disc, there's a bonus concerto of Vivaldi's Concerto for Two Violins, Strings and Harpsichord in A minor. I used to look down my nose at Vivaldi, thinking of him as the kind of composer that silly freshman girls would play while they studied in their dorm rooms (under their posters of Monet's Water Lilies of course). And then, I actually spent some time listening to his works and I found out I was missing out on some truly exceptional music. Once again, not unlike my initial and ridiculous trumpet-centric view on Mozart, I find there's something to appreciate in almost all major classical music composers.

Oh, and of course I grew to like Monet too. Although I haven't bought any posters. Yet.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co
15 comments
Read more

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty
8 comments
Read more

Shostakovich: First Symphony

I can't help it. I just don't like Shostakovich. This is the second time I've tried my hand at a Shosty symphony, after listening to and heartily disliking his Eleventh Symphony . Unfortunately, I felt no emotional connection to his First Symphony either. The music seems random and arbitrary to me--and to be honest, I even caught myself rolling my eyes at a few of Shosty's musical devices. And as I'll show in the listener notes, it's more film score music than symphony. ********************** Leonard Bernstein and the Chicago Symphony Dmitri Shostakovich (1906-1975) Shostakovich: Symphonies Nos. 1 & 7 Deutsche Grammophone, 1989 ********************** Lucky me: I've still got three more of his symphonies left to listen to: his Second, Seventh and Twelfth. A little historical background before we get to the listener notes: Shostakovich wrote his First Symphony in 1925 at the shockingly young age of 18. It was his graduation piece at the Leningrad Conserva
3 comments
Read more