Skip to main content

Mendelssohn: Symphony #4

Mendelssohn began the initial sketches of his Fourth Symphony after a visit to Italy. His visit there was part of a tour he took across Europe in his early twenties, something any newly-minted college kid might appreciate.

Of course Mendelssohn didn't exactly stay at youth hostels. Having been born into an extremely wealthy family, and already famous for his musical skills, he spent his tour dazzling the highest echelons of European society.
**********************
Herbert Von Karajan and the Berliner Philharmoniker
Felix Mendelssohn (1809-1847)
Five Symphonies
Deutsche Grammophon, 1973
**********************

Unfortunately, this symphony never really satisfied Mendelssohn. He made repeated and wholesale revisions to the work, and it was never published during his lifetime. And yet this work was loved when it first premiered, and it remains one of Mendelssohn's most popular works to this day.
Once again, a brilliant composer judges his own music far too harshly.

A quick musical recommendation for any readers interested in buying Mendelssohn's symphonies. The Five Symphonies CD from Deutsche Grammophon featured in today's post is definitely worth owning, but since his Third and Fourth Symphonies stand out above the others, there's an even better option: this highly regarded CD, also recorded by Karajan and the Berlin Philharmonic, which contains the Third and Fourth Symphonies by themselves. You can get the best of Mendelssohn while saving yourself an extra thirty bucks.

Listener notes for Mendelssohn's Fourth Symphony:
1) Right away we have quite a contrast to the Third Symphony, as this symphony lacks a lengthy dramatic intro and instead starts right in on the main theme.

2) Nice to hear a clarinet play a few parts and only be slightly off-key at times, unlike the clarinet playing on the last few discs I've listened to. I'm still reflexively cringing whenever I hear a clarinet, and I wonder how long it's going to take me to break that habit.

3)
The second movement starts out like a kind of a fugue, adding layer upon layer as it goes. The movement builds tension as the key shifts from minor to major several times. And then the music just fades away, softly and mysteriously. It's beautiful.

4) The trumpets don't get to do much during this symphony. And when they do come in, with some obligatory "bup bup-bup buhhhh" parts at the 5:54 in the third movement, it's clear
that their instruments have gone cold and out of tune. Sigh.

5) Did I like this work more or less than Mendelssohn's Third? Only slightly less. I really enjoyed both symphonies, but the twists and turns and extra drama and excitement of the Third makes it my favorite of this composer's symphonies. What a privilege it has been to have the opportunity to listen carefully to each of these works!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty

Schubert: Symphony #3

I have a confession to make. Today's CD is not only further proof of my need to start this blog, but it is perhaps the most embarrassing example of how mindless and uncontemplative my life had become over the past several years. This CD sat on my shelf with more than a hundred other CDs for years, unlistened to, unnoticed, and collecting dust. It was just like all the rest of my CDs, except, uh, in one key respect: It was still in its cellophane wrapper. I had been so out of touch with myself that I bought CDs that I forgot I bought. I must have wanted to listen to this CD at some point, but apparently in the time between buying the CD and putting it on the shelf, I got distracted. For ten years. That is a prime, and admittedly foolish-sounding, example of why I'm taking a break from my career, and why I started this blog. I guess I didn't want to wake up in another ten years and hear myself making excuses for myself like "I work too hard and make too much money to