Skip to main content

Schumann: Fantasie in C Major: Arabeske; Humoreske; Novelette No. 9

Today we'll pick up where we left off with Schumann's piano works, and we'll tackle disc 3 of my four-CD collection of this brilliant composer's piano works, which contains his Fantasie in C major (opus 17), Arabeske (opus 18) and Humoreske (opus 20).
**********************
Robert Schumann (1810-1856)
Performed by Wilhelm Kempff (1895-1991)
Schumann: Piano Works
Deutsche Grammophone, 1975
**********************

It's interesting to read that Robert Schumann and his wife Clara, despite the fact that they lived in the 1800s, experienced one particular problem that any modern two-career couple might find familiar:

In 1844, Clara persuaded her husband to accompany her on a lucrative four-month Russian tour. At a reception, he was asked if he too was a musician. A part of him resented her career and her fame.
--from David Dubal's The Essential Canon of Classical Music


Instead of feeling blessed (uh, and enriched?) by his wife's professional success, Schumann felt jealous. A shame, especially considering that over the next ten years his accelerating decline into insanity would sorely test--yet never break--Clara's loyalty and dedication.

Let's get into the listener notes. First, note that the three primary works on this CD are quite a bit longer than the three- or four-minute scenelets on disc 1 and disc 2 of this collection.

Listener notes for Fantasie in C major:
1) Right from the beginning, this work sounds very much like Chopin. Remember: the two composers were almost exact contemporaries--both born in 1810 and both dying young (Schumann at 46 and Chopin at 39).

2) There's a melody that appears a couple of times in the first movement (first at about the 2:45 mark, then again at 9:50) that sounds very much like the "recitative" passage of the first movement of Beethoven's Piano Sonata #17, (Der Sturm/The Tempest). Hopefully I'll get to writing about some more of Beethoven's piano sonatas in the coming weeks!

3) Wilhelm Kempff seems to be playing this piece quite a bit more cleanly than some of the other works on this 4-CD collection. Ironically he was 76 years old when he recorded "Fantasy", some four or five years older than he was when he recorded the first two works on disc one, which I claimed had so many mistakes. There goes that theory.

4) Is it just me, or do I hear another passage in the third movement that sounds like an homage to the middle movement of Beethoven's "Moonlight" Piano Sonata? It starts at the 2:09 mark, then repeats at different points in the movement, most distinctly at 6:25.

Listener notes for Arabeske:
1) This all-too-brief piece (just six and a half minutes) may be the most hypnotically beautiful work on this entire four-CD collection. A perfect piece to help you de-stress on the commute home from work.

Listener notes for Humoreske:
1) Notice how the first movement of this four-movement composition has multiple discrete sections, each of which could be considered a mini-movement, or a standalone piece. Much like many of the works in Schumann's Papillons or his Carnaval.

2) I hear a few mistakes creeping into Kempff's playing in the second movement.

3) The third movement contains segments entitled "Sehr Lebhaft" and "Mit einegem Pomp" which roughly translates to "Very lively" and "With some pomp." I guess that's sort of humor-esque.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co...

Schumann: Second Symphony

I stood by the body of my passionately loved husband, and was calm. All my feelings were absorbed in thankfulness to God that he was at last set free, and as I kneeled by his bed I was filled with awe. It was as if his holy spirit was hovering over me--Ah! If only he had taken me with him. --Clara Schumann, after the death of her husband Robert Schumann We return to George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra's exceptional recording of Schumann's Four Symphonies to hear his Symphony #2. ********************** George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra Robert Schumann (1810-1856) Schumann: Symphonies 1-4; Manfred Overture CBS, 1958/Sony, 1996 ********************** When I sat down to listen to Schumann's Second Symphony, I assumed it would sound as Mozart-like as his First Symphony. I couldn't have been more wrong: these two symphonies sound strikingly different. Listener Notes for Schumann's Symphony #2: 1) You can tell right away that this symphony is far more Roman...

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty ...