Skip to main content

Beethoven: Piano Trios: "Ghost" and "Archduke"

In today's post, we'll take yet another short break from symphonic works, and a return to some more beautiful works of chamber music.
**********************
Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827)
Piano Trio in D major, "Ghost"
Piano Trio in B flat major, "Archduke"
The Geister Trio
Deutsche Grammophon, 1970
**********************
Beethoven's symphonies certainly get the bulk of attention from listeners, in part because in many peoples' view, he brought the symphonic composition to a point of utter perfection (although some might say ponderous imperfection). But his chamber music is considered equally as important from an artistic standpoint--and quite frankly, it's quite a bit more relaxing to listen to.

Today's musical selections are piano trios, which consist of a violin, a cello and a piano. Or more accurately stated, a fortepiano, which was the a predecessor to the modern piano, and was the instrument in use in Beethoven's day.

Beethoven was also considered one of the greatest fortepiano players of his era, and in addition to piano trios, he composed a 32 piano sonatas (these are works for solo piano) which were renowned for their technical difficulty. We'll listen to some of these piano sonatas in the coming months.

These trios are so beautiful, austere and elegant, it's almost impossible to believe how quickly Beethoven wrote them: Beethoven composed Ghost in 1808, the same year he composed his Fifth and Sixth Symphonies, and he composed the Archduke trio in just one month's time, in 1811.




Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
These were composed in the Romantic Era...think Keats and Shelley.

And I personally feel that "Ghost" is one of the sexiest pieces of chamber music ever composed! :)

Moopy
April 4, 2008 at 5:16 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co...
15 comments
Read more

Schumann: Second Symphony

I stood by the body of my passionately loved husband, and was calm. All my feelings were absorbed in thankfulness to God that he was at last set free, and as I kneeled by his bed I was filled with awe. It was as if his holy spirit was hovering over me--Ah! If only he had taken me with him. --Clara Schumann, after the death of her husband Robert Schumann We return to George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra's exceptional recording of Schumann's Four Symphonies to hear his Symphony #2. ********************** George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra Robert Schumann (1810-1856) Schumann: Symphonies 1-4; Manfred Overture CBS, 1958/Sony, 1996 ********************** When I sat down to listen to Schumann's Second Symphony, I assumed it would sound as Mozart-like as his First Symphony. I couldn't have been more wrong: these two symphonies sound strikingly different. Listener Notes for Schumann's Symphony #2: 1) You can tell right away that this symphony is far more Roman...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty ...
8 comments
Read more