Skip to main content

Rimsky-Korsakov: Russian Easter Festival Overture and Capriccio Espagnol

Let's briefly reprise my favorite classical music quote about Rimsky-Korsakov:

"The works of Rimsky-Korsakov music may be conveniently divided into two groups: the overplayed and the unknown."
--Richard Taruskin, author, The Oxford History of Western Music (6 Volume Set)

And now that we've already covered three "unknown"works by this composer, it's time to listen to two of the "overplayed" ones. Today we'll cover the Russian Easter Festival Overture and the Capriccio Espagnol, and at last we'll have finished off this amazing two-CD set of Rimsky-Korsakov's works.
**********************
Neeme Jarvi and the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra
Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov (1844-1908)

Three Symphonies; Capriccio Espagnol; Russian Easter Festival Overture
Deutsche Grammophon, 1988

**********************
Listener notes:
Russian Easter Festival Overture:
1) The slightly out of tune oboe solos in the early minutes of the work detracts from the performance. The oboe, much like the clarinet, can be a mournful and beautiful instrument when played well. When played even slightly poorly however, it can be highly distracting. There's just not a lot of room for error with this instrument.

2) Once again, R-K uses unusual, as well as varying, meters during this composition. Portions of it are in 5/2 time, other portions are in 2/1 and 3/1 time.

3) How about at the 12:30 mark when the tubas and trombones come in with a ponderous rendering of the primary theme? The tuba player must have lungs the size of a refrigerator.

4) The final minute of this work might be one of the most rousing minutes in all of classical music. no wonder this work is among the "overplayed" of Rimsky-Korsakov's works.

Capriccio Espagnol:
1) My favorite movement is the second (Variazioni), with the opening melody by the french horn section, transferring to the strings, and then to a call and response between the english horn, a french horn and an answering muted french horn (a side note: the english horn is one of classical music's most illogically named instruments. A reeded instrument, it is neither English, nor a horn!).

2) The last couple of minutes of the second movement simply washes over the audience with wave after wave and layer after layer of sound. What is it about these Russian composers that gives them the ability to compose such gripping music?

3) Interesting effects with the clarinet runs in the last few seconds of the third movement.

4) I'm sure even novice classical music listeners will recognize the opening bars of the fourth movement. And does the ensuing violin solo remind you at all of Scheherazade? It should. Next, how about that flute solo, ending in (for a flute at least) a rippingly loud high note?

5) Unlike R-K's symphonies, which were neither technically nor physically difficult to play, the Capriccio Espagnol has some extremely difficult (as well as unusual) parts for several different instruments.

6) And the rousing finish to the fifth movement (Fandango Asturiano) is guaranteed to bring any classical music audience leaping out of their seats. No wonder it's a staple of the symphonic repertoire.



Comments

Laura said…
Bravo! Your detailed writing helps bring the music to life. Thank you for a wonderful post!
Daniel said…
Thanks Laura. You're my biggest fan! :)

Popular posts from this blog

Does Bach Suck?

It's not often that you see a classical music-related comment that makes you spit out your coffee : "Bach sucks because he was not a true composer. A true composer hears the music before he writes it. Bach composed using a mathematical system of numbers which he tought[sic] his students. After his death one of his students published a book “How to write a menuet[sic] with little or no musical knowledge”. Frankly, the result of his work is not musical, the opening bars always sound musical because he copied someone else’s melody, broke it down into numbers and wrote counterpoint from it. Handel did not even like Bach, because Handel wrote music. Anyone who does like Bach does so because they are told to. For a comparison, listen to music by Frescobaldi, Rameau, or Couperin, then listen to Bach. The difference? Something that is musical throughout the entire piece, and something that is musical for 10 seconds and quickly loses interest." Once I'd finished mopping the co...

Schumann: Second Symphony

I stood by the body of my passionately loved husband, and was calm. All my feelings were absorbed in thankfulness to God that he was at last set free, and as I kneeled by his bed I was filled with awe. It was as if his holy spirit was hovering over me--Ah! If only he had taken me with him. --Clara Schumann, after the death of her husband Robert Schumann We return to George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra's exceptional recording of Schumann's Four Symphonies to hear his Symphony #2. ********************** George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra Robert Schumann (1810-1856) Schumann: Symphonies 1-4; Manfred Overture CBS, 1958/Sony, 1996 ********************** When I sat down to listen to Schumann's Second Symphony, I assumed it would sound as Mozart-like as his First Symphony. I couldn't have been more wrong: these two symphonies sound strikingly different. Listener Notes for Schumann's Symphony #2: 1) You can tell right away that this symphony is far more Roman...

Why Classical Music Writing is So Difficult to Read

Have you ever read the liner notes of a classical music CD and scratched your head wondering what the heck the writer was trying to say? Or attempted to read a classical music concert review in your newspaper and felt totally illiterate? One of the things that frustrates many people about classical music is its perceived elitism. It's unfortunate, but most of what gets written about classical music only worsens that perception. Most of the classical music writing I see out there--either in symphony concert program books, in concert reviews in major papers like the New York Times, or worst of all in the little essays in the booklets accompanying most classical music CDs--is quite simply terrible. Often, it is pretentiously written, it is full of industry jargon (yes, even the classical music industry has its own jargon), and it reads like an intellectually insecure liberal arts student's PhD thesis. There are a few reasons for this. First, there's the fundamental difficulty ...